TKOG Who lives and dies by the screen, to say nothing of reading by it

by That Kind of Girl on February 26, 2010

NTKOG #120: The kind of part-android nerdette who cannot indulge any hobby without fully digitizing it — including reading 75-year-old books.

I am: guilty of staring at various screens for probably sixteen hours a day. I can’t even take a long shower without starting to twitch for my iPhone.

I am not: so digitally obsessed that I’ve forgotten the single greatest pleasure in life is curling up with a great book (and a hot toddy).

The Scene: The friggin’ internet, as per uzh. Ever since I first heard about them a few years ago, I’ve sworn up and down that I would never — NEVER! — use a Kindle; however, when I downloaded some (free) Wodehouse on the (free) Kindle app for iPhone, realized it was time to admit that there may be a place in my life for digitized books. Sure, they may lack physical heft, asethetic charm, conversation-starting opportunities, any link to tradition, and the ability to be read in the bath, but — wait, fuck, why was I doing this again?

Still, since I’m always one for GOING BIG, I set my goal: to read Gone With The Wind in entirely digital form.

At first, this was going exceptionally well: I found the link to the novel on the Australian Project Gutenberg, and kept it open in a window of my browser at work all day. Over the course of a couple of slow afternoons, I read about a quarter of the book. I was also like kind of completely unemployable. While collating papers, filing extermination reports, waiting for the phone to ring, I was completely lost in the most scintillating literary soap opera in the history of American letters.

“You’ve reached [TKOG's Company], my name is TKOG. How can I help you?” I would choke, while Atlanta burned.

“Are you — are you crying?” dude on the other end would yelp.

“We’re just [sniff] so happy to get your call. How can I help you?” Oh goddamnit, Rhett Butler, YOU ROGUE!

But while reading online was actual more convenient for work (procrastination that looks way more legitimate than facebook or blog-stalking!), my little system fell apart during the times that I should actually spend reading. On my honor, and because I already own two used copies of it back in California, I opted not to shell out $8 for access to the novel on iPhone Kindle. Instead, I swindled Margaret Mitchell’s estate the ghetto way, by emailing myself three-chapter chunks of the novel to read on my phone during the commute.

Fun fact: If you see someone reading a book and weeping gently while on the bus, you might — if you are of a literary bent — assume they are a kindred soul and smile on indulgently. If you see a chick clutching her iPhone and hyperventasobbing, there is only one logical conclusion: text-message break-up. (You can’t text-message break-up! You can’t text-message break-up!)

The other big way in which technology has made reading worse is that technology and bathtime don’t mix. And since basically all the times are bathtime in the TKOG manse, this was a problem. I dragged in my end table to attempt to set up a reading station, but even between my keyboard condom and generous plastic bag covering, was too freaked out to scroll. GWTW may be good, but it’s not worth exposing my computer to a watery death.

The Verdict: If I were really beating myself up, I could probably finish this, but as it is, I seem to have stalled about halfway through the novel — and this is after three weeks! If I’d had a paper copy, I would have finished it three times over by now. So. If you live in the Boston area and want to lend your used copy of Gone With The Wind to a broke Rhett Butler aficionado, dude, I (maybe) promise not to read it in the bath!

That said, online reading is awesome at work, and probably would have worked out much better if I hadn’t been so bullheaded about choosing the longest and weep-in-public-iest novel ever. Dude, though, what can I say. I could watch 90-year-old man choke to death on a leukemia kitten and merely Tweet a “:-(” about the spectacle, but something about the written word just sends me off crying jags. Good way to score a double-seat to yourself on the bus, I guess.

{ 28 comments… read them below or add one }

Wicked Shawn February 26, 2010 at 8:27 am

I personally think GWTW is a great choice. My next would be Pride and Prejudice. I am incapable of digi-reading, as well. I like to feel a book in my hands. Curling up with my Kindle? No thanks. Just not feeling that.

Reply

julia February 26, 2010 at 9:00 am

I love gone with the wind! i first read in in 5th grade, at all of 10 years old (I was sooo proud! all 1027 pages, or whatever) and i’ve read itprobably 4 or 5 times since. but i love my old vintage copy, with a burgundy cloth hardcover and vellum-thin pages – i would never trade it in for a digital version.

my copy happens to be in the boston area, and i would lend it to you, only problem is that i’m in spain and cant really get to it! :)

Reply

chiefy February 26, 2010 at 9:14 am

Honestly this is the first time I’ve heard anyone say anything positive about GWTW. I have it on my bookshelf but, like you said, it’s huge! And so I was intimidated. But it’s a good read, you say?
Maybe I’ll put it back on the list of things to read. (which is huge because I’m in school right now and three of my five classes are literature classes and so I am ‘not allowed’ to read fun books which is MAKING ME CRAZY)

Reply

That Kind of Girl February 26, 2010 at 10:46 am

Oh man, GWTW is thrilling! I think most girls read it for the first time in those tender tween years, when it’s especially thrilling, but if you’re looking for an intense antebellum sobfest, then look no further! This is my first re-read since I was a kid, but I can definitely assure you that in my eyes, GWTW is way better than it is long. (It’s also a quick read for the size because it’s such a page-turner.)

Reply

Sister February 26, 2010 at 1:16 pm

Not only have I NOT read GWTW, I never plan on doing so. I had the same pact with anything Bronte and Austen, but that plan back-fired when the ONLY available writing class my freshman year was called, “Love and Marriage in Victorian Ages.” For the love of god! I barely made it through the required course, but I really hate mopey women in literature (yet, Bella Swan doesn’t annoy me at all. Go figure!). Dude, either he loves you or he doesn’t, and either way he is probably scum. Get a freaking cat and go on with your life.

Reply

Danielle February 26, 2010 at 2:09 pm

That’s because “Twilight” does not count as literature. Yes! I said it!

Reply

Hot Hands February 26, 2010 at 2:23 pm

I don’t think Sister cares that it is not literature, but this comment definitely made me smile today. It needed to be said :)

Reply

Sister February 26, 2010 at 3:43 pm

Awe thanks, Hot Hands!

Well, I didn’t technically mean for Twilight to get lumped into the literature category when I commented. I honestly don’t understand why everyone hates Bella…

Hot Hands, I have some updates to share with you! Perhaps tomorrow I will call you.

Reply

Alison February 26, 2010 at 9:31 am

I’m a GWTW lover, too. I don’t think I could use a Kindle, either. Rhett was a man that was meant for the tissue paper thin pages and the worn cover of my hard copy. There’s something wrong with digitalizing a man that thought telegrams were the way of the future.

Reply

Sadako February 26, 2010 at 10:17 am

I myself don’t know if I could read a book off a screen…I don’t know. I’m just not ready! Don’t take my books! my warm papery books!

GWTW in digital form is impressive, too. I’ve only managed to get through it once, in paper form.

Reply

shine February 26, 2010 at 10:37 am

My mom bought me a Kindle when they first came out. I have mixed feelings about it. The battery always seems to be dead, so it’s like someone glued the pages of my books together. NOT COOL. But it’s super for traveling because I can have what? A hundred books in there? And they don’t take up extra room in my suitcase.

Having said all that, I NEVER use my Kindle. Like, never. I do, however, use my Kindle for iPhone app. It’s genius. It means if I forget my book, I always have one with me. I can download them in a few seconds, if I’ve finished the last one. I use it to read on my lunch break or when I get stuck waiting somewhere. I love it.

Nothing will ever replace an actual book. I love the pages. I love the smell. All that. But it’s nice to have both, sometimes.

Oh, and I totally read on my iPhone in the bath…I’m just asking for trouble.

Reply

Raggedy Sarah February 26, 2010 at 12:24 pm

My mom learned how English by reading GWTW when she was 13. I’ve been meaning to read it ever since I heard that story. Maybe now is the time!

Reply

Maureen February 26, 2010 at 12:47 pm

Holy Crap. Reading at work? I am punching myself in the head for not thinking of that. I’m like trying to kill time at work AND complaining that I never have time to read outside of work. You just rocked my world, that’s all I have to say about that. Book club book online- here we come! And this kindle app– I will have to look into this.

Reply

Anglophile February 26, 2010 at 1:40 pm

You don’t text message break up! Lulz cos I knewthat was coming the minute you began talking about hyperventilating on the phone.

You hvae changed my life with this free Kindle
app for iPhone

Reply

Danielle February 26, 2010 at 2:11 pm

I actually like the Nook. They won’t steal your copy of “1984″ in the biggest display of non-irony in history like the Kindle did.

Reply

kahlia March 10, 2010 at 7:42 pm

I just wanted to let you know that I got that stolen-”1984″ reference, since I’m sure not a lot of people read news about e-readers and I didn’t want you to feel alone. (Also, agreed! That is so not allowed!)
I actually like how the Nooks looks a lot, but it doesn’t support enough file formats. I don’t have an e-reader yet, but since I’m in Europe when I do get one (despite how much I love paper books) it’ll be the new BeBook. Which will be especially useful for travelling (I make 2-ish inter-continental trips a year plus usually a couple of other little intra-continental trips… which isn’t a LOT, but it’s enough to not want to carry lots of heavy books!).

Reply

Lizzie February 26, 2010 at 2:46 pm

I have tried IN VAIN to read a book online but it just ain’t happening!! I tend to fall asleep or end up losing sight in one eye because the screen messes with me… I’ll stick to paper I think, although ask me when I finally get my hands on a Kindle!

Reply

Dave February 26, 2010 at 3:06 pm

Kindle seems like such a good idea but no warmth. Two seats on the bus? When I’m riding my bicycle on the local trails, I’ll listen to books on my iPod. “Confederacy of Dunces” is LOLF. Great excxept when you are approaching someone on the trail and bust out laughing. They look at you like you’re John wayne Gacy. I’m going to stick to “The Fascinating World of Foam Plasma” from now on!

Reply

rebel mel February 26, 2010 at 4:45 pm

Loving the new layout! It’s funny, because my weekly project was supposed to be to revamp my blog (which I clearly didn’t complete yet)

GMTA..

As for the books on phone, I have a few of them. I got through the first chapter of Alice in Wonderland, and completely forgot about it. That was about six months ago. Thanks for reminding me. Better get back to that.

Reply

Kori February 26, 2010 at 8:14 pm

Exactly the reason I cannot purchase a Kindle (though you bet your ass I’m dying for an iPad) – I take baths more than any normal human should, and I always must read in the bath.

Reply

kahlia March 10, 2010 at 7:44 pm

Some of the new e-readers have a text-to-speech feature, which seems like it might be nice to have it “read to you” when you don’t want to be looking at the screen or touching the device (as with wet hands).

Reply

Romantic Comedee February 26, 2010 at 8:25 pm

Part of me really wants a kindle and part of me really can’t see myself ever using it. I have problems with libraries too because I am soooo stuck on owning books. I don’t like to return them.

Reply

OG February 26, 2010 at 9:32 pm

As a heads up…the movie is only 4 hours and requires much less effort :) It’s rare that I read an entire book, but I read enough blogs in a week to make up an entire book – and I read them at work. Thank god I work alone, although if the IT people are tracking my computer usage I’m screwed. I prefer my books in audio form…so I can listen to them while I drive and text and talk on the phone.

Reply

sandyb February 27, 2010 at 9:35 am

I agree. Work completely interferes with fun things: Blogging, Google Reader Reading, Reading in general, and drinking. All of these things hurt my heart.

I, alas, fall into the same category as Sister, having never read GWTW, although I want to. I do. It’s a classic and an era that, well, I wish I was born in. Something about 2010 just doesn’t feel as romantic, am I right?

My husband thinks the Kindle will replace the book. So I told him Guitar Hero would replace his Gretsch. He shut up.

Reply

That Kind of Girl February 27, 2010 at 10:44 am

SANDY! That’s the best response to threats of Kindle taking over books that I’ve ever heard. I so needed that laugh-out-loud moment this morning. Love it.

Reply

Raggedy Sarah February 27, 2010 at 11:45 am

Agreed. Work is a HUGE pain. I avoid it at all costs.

Reply

ali February 27, 2010 at 12:17 pm

I think this week is the Week of the Kindle or something. Seriously, I keep hearing/reading about it, discussing it, arguing about it…

I still want to turn pages.

Reply

peter brown March 15, 2010 at 11:39 pm

This blog is Gorgeous. I’ll send you a paperback copy of GWTW.
Read RHETT BUTLER’s side of the story.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

Google Analytics Alternative