TKOG Who doesn’t talk the talk

by That Kind of Girl on April 27, 2010

NTKOG #161: The kind of prim, gaggingly normal conversationalist who makes no mention of rummy coves, says “fuck” when she thinks “frig,” and does not preface every sentence by hailing imaginary dudes.

I am: a machine that turns air into slang.

I am not: defending this decision. It has at times cost me the good judgment of strangers, the approval of my elders and even career opportunities. But, I mean, dude.

The Scene: The Broca’s Area in my red-hot cerebellum, which is engaged in the non-stop techno pulsings that make me — if you hadn’t noticed — talk like a cross between a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle and T-Rex. Something reptilian, at any rate.

Secret, guys? The way I write in this blog is pretty much precisely the way I talk. I sneeze out these posts stream-of-consciousness, so every “like” and “dude” and mawkish spot of amateur poetics? Just like they’re found in nature. (The way I write this blog is also, ironically, not the way I write, although I suppose the sheer volume of my archives makes a pretty good bid at debunking that claim.)

But for one week back in March, I struck every questionable specimen from my linguistic collection. Not only my she-bro surfer slang (dude!), but my occasional Elizabethan staples (for-friggin’-sooth) and all the acronyms I use in real life that people only pretend to understand. And my ongoing (imaginary) tea-time banter with Sir Wodehouse? Dash it all!

The mildness of the results was disheartening to say the least. At work, I’d comport myself primly with irate customers, then, swinging into Co-Worker’s cube, bite back my usual “Frig those beezies, Chief” and instead continue in the same well-modulated tone: “That was such a frustrating phone call.” But where’s the sizzle to the thing?!

Every strained utterance became an endless monologue. On the phone with Sister, where once a piquant duuude might have sufficed, instead I was forced to soliloquize: “How exciting!” Who has time for all those syllables? The literal meaning without the emotional undercurrent? I was poaching to death in the blandest of broths.

One day, late in the experiment, Co-Worker went so far as to ask whether I was sad about something. Dude, kind of. For a whole week, I’d disappeared into the general murmur. And while I’m sure, at my job and in my personal conversations, I came off as more professional and perhaps a bit more interested in other people, I missed having people react to me. No laughter, no eye-widened “come again?”s, no appraising smirks in line at the bagel place. I felt like Lady Gaga on a day she’d accidentally remembered to wear pants out of the house. I was nobody.

The Verdict: See, Mom? I really can talk like a proper lady every once in a while. And after this experiment, I concede that I possibly should have scaled back on my lexical finger-painting while I was running rounds of job interviews last fall. People do seem to respond more comfortably to conventionally articulate speech. But it’s like Shakespeare said. To thine own self, y’know, like, whatever.

{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }

middleagedwaitress April 27, 2010 at 7:14 am

This sounds like a challenge that I could never do. The things that I exclaim occasionally shock me, and I am fairly unshockable.
And the worst of it? I have a pretty decent filter and edit myself like crazy. Despite that, people still regard my vocab as a highly unusual semi-combustible substance. (aweeeewsome-0!)

Reply

Euforilla April 27, 2010 at 7:24 am

“To thine own self, y’know, like, whatever.”

Can this become one of my favourite quotes? Yes? Yes.
Thanks!

Reply

carissa April 27, 2010 at 8:00 am

hahaha Every so once in a while I attempt to rid myself of slangish nonsense and it never works for long. Good for you though. I may just give it one last attempt today, just to see….

Reply

Dave April 27, 2010 at 9:03 am

After the experiment was over, how did Sir Wodehouse weigh in on the week? :)

Reply

Daily Virgin April 27, 2010 at 12:09 pm

Apparently, I have an everyday colloquial-tastic speech where “dude,” “bitch, please”, and “oh hell naw” are liberally peppered throughout my side of the dialogue (I basically sound like a gay, ghetto surfer).

And then I have what many refer to as my “professional voice”.

Guess which one is mocked more.

Reply

kahlia April 27, 2010 at 1:53 pm

I has occurred to me before to attempt to reduce my slang usage, but really it just doesn’t matter, so I haven’t bothered to make it permanent. (I can mostly turn it off for job interviews, though, which is convenient.)

It has become one of my many mini-missions in recent years to teach my Spanish partner all kinds of American* slang. He now knows that the only appropriate response to “So I got that goin’ for me” is “Which is nice”, and other such useful information. (He also says “like” to mean “approximately”, which I’m quite proud of given that he spends a fair amount of time mocking the speech patterns of the American study abroad kids here in Europe.)
*Or at least the stuff we repeat constantly in my family, which I like to think applies to the majority of the US… or at least to our little corner of the Midwest.

Reply

Dave April 27, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Love it!
“big hitter the Lama…..Long.”

Reply

kahlia April 27, 2010 at 4:28 pm

hehehehe! Thank you: “big hitter, the Lama” is actually one of my favorite lines from that whole movie full of great lines!

Reply

That Kind of Girl April 27, 2010 at 2:20 pm

I love it! I didn’t know that there was a proper response to “So I got that goin’ for me” — I’m going to start saying that now! Mad propz, for spreading the good (slang) word abroad!

Reply

kahlia April 27, 2010 at 4:37 pm

Here’s a clip of the scene, but if you have time and want to really understand how awesome Bill Murray’s character is, rent/download/Netflix the whole movie (Caddyshack).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x-nQ-vPw5k&feature=related
The video quality is not the best, but at least the audio hasn’t been removed like in some of the other clips!

I randomly say “So I got that goin’ for me” (and similarly important lines from other movies) in regular conversations just to see if people will catch it and respond accordingly. It’s so rare, but I love when they do (hence the major giggles to Dave’s response)!

Reply

Dave April 27, 2010 at 4:57 pm

Thanks, not nearly as rare as a girl who
can quote from that movie!

Reply

psi*psi April 27, 2010 at 1:54 pm

I felt like Lady Gaga on a day she’d accidentally remembered to wear pants out of the house.

Favorite sentence, hands down.

Reply

The Ex April 29, 2010 at 3:08 am

My favorite too.

Reply

NoviceWorldTraveler August 28, 2011 at 3:25 am

Oh yeah – my favorite too!

Reply

The Naked Redhead April 27, 2010 at 4:44 pm

Bwhaahaha! This post is fantastic. I dunno if I could go a whole week without saying “balls” or “wootsauce”. That’s be hard!

Reply

Sarah-Rose April 27, 2010 at 7:13 pm

Ahh this post took me two tries to read as I suddenly decided it was a TRAVESTY that I had never read any Wodehouse and had to go purchase an anthology IMMEDIATELY.

Reply

That Kind of Girl April 27, 2010 at 10:32 pm

!!!!!!!! YES! Rarely, if ever, has a comment made me any happier! My favorites are the Jeeves & Wooster stories (obviously), the Ukridge stories, and a bunch of his stand-alone novels. Let me know if you love him! (Hint: if you can manage to slog through my blog entries, then YOU WILL.)

Reply

ali April 27, 2010 at 10:49 pm

Since I’m waaaay too lazy to actually check, considering the way you write this thing, did you lose the slang on here for the week? I’m guessing not ’cause I’d probably’ve noticed (and surely someone would’ve said something). If not, sounds a bit like cheating to me.

Not really, though. And I don’t know what kind of crazy power you have but over the past few months, I’ve found myself saying (or at least thinking) “dude” more often than I ever did. Um, thanks.

Reply

That Kind of Girl April 27, 2010 at 11:13 pm

Totally did cheat with the blog: I only started the experiment on a day after which I’d pre-written all of my posts for the week. After all, would you guys really read me if I weren’t a total slang-gasm? (Don’t answer that.) Although I did cut the slang in all of my blog comments and gchat conversations for the week. It was truly ghastly.

Also, not-so-secretly glad to be subtly sowing crops of “dude” in the general populace. But to protect everyone’s linguistic virtue, I should probably put a disclaimer on this blog that it’s not to be read within two hours before any vital job interview…

Reply

ali April 28, 2010 at 9:17 am

Lousy cheater. Just kidding. By the way, I’m not sure how this happened but I think I dropped an “o” somewhere (I know that too has two of them). I blame my keyboard. If you happen to find one lying around, it’s probably mine.

Reply

Mom April 27, 2010 at 11:37 pm

Dear, half the time I have no idea what you are saying and must look up many of the big words. You remind me a lot of your b.c. father. Yo dear, get down, Must return to “Dancing With The Stars.” Later.

Reply

Sada April 28, 2010 at 12:11 am

I think we can all agree that Lady Gaga should remain pantsless. Metaphorically. But probably not at job interviews.

Reply

Clare April 29, 2010 at 6:49 am

How marvellous! I might try it myself today.

A few years ago my old flatmate and I tried speaking in the style of Jane Austen, but I think we only managed half an hour!

Reply

Kori April 29, 2010 at 7:48 pm

Ah yes – I understand your plight, particularly as I am the law student who talks like a cast member of The Hills. I’m trying to cut down on “like.” That’s about as much strength as I can muster.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

Google Analytics Alternative